(CACD 2025) item 130 - (Língua Inglesa). The author argues that the ethical governance of A

Enunciado:

Diplomacy is often described as an art, involving decisions shaped by sensitive political nuances that require human judgment, cultural understanding, and emotional intelligence — qualities that AI cannot fully replicate. While AI can support decision-making, it may also manipulate human behavior subtly, especially through systems developed in countries with different geopolitical priorities. This deepens the AI divide between technologically advanced and resource-limited nations, embedding linguistic and cultural biases and reinforcing global power asymmetries. As algorithms take their place alongside diplomats, the art of negotiation now meets the science of AI. The future of diplomacy must lie in fostering a symbiotic relationship where AI enhances human expertise, streamlines processes, and offers new strategic tools while leaving the nuanced art of diplomacy in human hands.

Diplomatic institutions adopting such technologies should also adopt guardrails to clarify how these systems inform decision-making. To ensure that AI systems function appropriately across diverse cultural contexts, adaptive and responsible AI frameworks should be integrated into policy discussions at the national and international levels. Crucially, any AI deployment must prioritise human agency. The goal must not be to automate diplomacy, but to augment it. AI’s incorporation into diplomacy offers both promise and peril. While the technology supports efficiency and expands access to information, it must be governed by strong ethical frameworks, particularly when it can shape global power relations through sensitive negotiations. Rather than embracing AI as a magic wand, it must be approached as a double-edged sword that is capable of assisting, but never replacing the unique human skills that diplomacy demands.

Judge the following items based on the ideas presented in the preceding text, as well as on its linguistic aspects.

Texto do item:

The author argues that the ethical governance of AI’s application in diplomacy is especially critical because its influence may extend beyond technical efficiency to altering the global distribution of political power.

Participe das discussões abaixo gratuitatmente. Caso não tenha conta no ClippingCACD, basta criar uma conta gratuitamtente. Não é necessário assinar para participar.
Fez a prova? Junte-se ao ranking e confira o gabarito em https://depoisdaprova.com.br .

Gabarito sugerido: C
O texto destaca que a IA pode “manipular o comportamento humano”, “aprofundar assimetrias de poder” e “modelar as relações de poder globais”. Portanto, o autor defende que a governança ética é crucial justamente porque o impacto da IA vai além da eficiência técnica, podendo alterar a distribuição de poder político entre Estados e atores internacionais. A afirmativa reflete fielmente essa ideia, sendo, pois, correta.


Comentário automático feito pela inteligência artificial do Clipping.ai apenas para referência. Comentários dos nossos professores virão a seguir.

Correto. O texto afirma que a governança ética da IA é essencial, especialmente porque essa tecnologia pode afetar as relações de poder globais, indo além da mera eficiência técnica. A ideia está claramente expressa no trecho “must be governed by strong ethical frameworks, particularly when it can shape global power relations”.

Professor, bom dia. Nesse caso, se o texto diz que a IA reforça as assimetrias de poder não seria equivalente a manter a concentração dessa distribuição de poder da forma atual? Então essa mudança não estaria contrária ao que é afirmado? Obrigada desde já.